midpage

Schaffer v. EvansSchaffer v. Evans

New York Court of Appeals
Nov 9, 1982
Versions:57 N.Y.2d 992
443 N.E.2d 485
457 N.Y.S.2d 237
1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3837

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Appellate Division that plaintiff’s causes of action against the State officials are primarily claims against the State for money damages and as such could only be entertained in the Court of Claims (Court of Claims Act, § 9, subd 4). Nor can it be said that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in not converting this complaint requesting monetary compensation for past services into an article 78 proceeding.

Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur; Chief Judge Cooke taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: Schaffer v. Evans
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 9, 1982
Citations: 57 N.Y.2d 992; 443 N.E.2d 485; 457 N.Y.S.2d 237; 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3837
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In