History
  • No items yet
midpage
Schaeffer Et Ux v. Young
158 Fla. 749
| Fla. | 1947
|
Check Treatment

This is the third appearance of the issues involved in this case here. See Young et al v. Schaeffer, 155 Fla. 887, 22 So. (2) 252; Schaeffer et al v. Young et al, 157 Fla. 611, 26 So. (2) 725. The principles of law presented and determined in our disposition of those cases are identical with those presented on this appeal.

In fact, the burden of the insistence made by the appellant is that we reconsider our action in those cases and now overrule what was held in those cases and thereupon to reverse the decree which is the basis of this decree.

We find no error in the decree and, therefore, the same is affirmed on authority of our opinions and judgments in the cases above referred to.

So ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., ADAMS and BARNS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Schaeffer Et Ux v. Young
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Apr 22, 1947
Citation: 158 Fla. 749
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.