Schadel v. Honig

134 A. 919 | N.J. | 1926

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.