Schadel v. Honig
134 A. 919 | N.J. | 1926
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the court below.
For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None. *204