History
  • No items yet
midpage
Scarlett v. Scarlett
736 So. 2d 125
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1999
Check Treatment
DAUKSCH, J.

This is an appeal from a marriage dissolution judgment. The final hearing was unrecorded and thus no transcript is available for our review of the evidence. Further, appellant did not supply us with a stipulated statement to support his contentions regarding the evidence. We have no option except to affirm the judgment as far as the evidentiary attacks are concerned. Beasley v. Beasley, 463 So.2d 1248 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).

However, it appears from the judgment that mathematical calculations were made in error and that arrearages were ordered where unwarranted. Because we must remand this case for recalculation and a new judgment, it is in the interest of the parties and the children to allow the parties to have a rehearing on all support *126matters. The judgment is otherwise affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

W. SHARP and PETERSON, JJ„ concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Scarlett v. Scarlett
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jun 25, 1999
Citation: 736 So. 2d 125
Docket Number: No. 98-3380
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.