Savin Hill Yacht Club Ass'n v. Savin Hill Yacht Club

246 Mass. 75 | Mass. | 1923

DeCourcy, J.

This is a petition by a Massachusetts corporation for dissolution and the distribution of its assets. The petition was opposed by the Savin Hill Yacht Club, another Massachusetts corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Yacht Club. The judge of the Superior Court who heard the case without a jury, denied certain requests for rulings presented by the Yacht Club, made some findings of fact and rulings of law, and entered an interlocutory decree dissolving the petitioner and appointing a receiver.

The material facts, as agreed upon or found by the judge, are as follows: There existed from 1875 to 1888 an unincorporated association known as Savin Hill Beach Association. In 1888 the Savin Hill Yacht Club was incorporated, without capital stock, “ for the purpose of encouraging yachting and maintaining a place for social meetings.” It numbered among its members practically all the members of the old Beach Association, succeeded to its assets, leased certain land, and built thereon a yacht clubhouse. On July 17, 1906, the Yacht Club bought some land, beach and flats at Savin Hill, known as Fox Point, and moved its clubhouse and equipment thereto. At that time the membership was of two classes: active, who were entitled to all privileges; and limited, whose initiation fees and dues were smaller, and who had no ownership in the boats or right to vote. The Club was financed by dues, money borrowed on mortgages and notes, and receipts from entertainments.

At a meeting of the Yacht Club on March 9, 1908, the constitution was altered, so as to create five classes of members, i. e. regular, associate, limited, honorary and nonresident. The amended constitution also provided that “ regular ” members should be limited to the then “ active ” members, and that the number thereof should be reduced to and permanently remain at one hundred; that regular members on ceasing to be such would forfeit all interest in the property; that associate members should have the privileges of regular members, “ except that they shall have no ownership in the property of the Club, and no right to vote at its business meetings, or to hold office, or to take any part in the management of the affairs of the Club; ” and that limited members should be entitled to all the privileges of associate members except boat ownership and locker rights. There were then about one hundred and eighty-four active members, who were thereafter retained on the records as regular members. On April 10, 1913, this number had been reduced by death and otherwise to one hundred and fourteen, — constituting the entire regular membership.

At the annual meeting of the Yacht Club on October 10, 1912, a report was made by the executive committee, which had been considering how associate members might properly be taken in as regular members. “ In view of the sole ownership of the property being in the Regular members,” the committee recommended that a new corporation be organized, with a capital stock of $12,000; that the property be conveyed to it, the debts of the Yacht Club assumed by it, and the new corporation lease the property to the Club; and that the latter’s constitution and by-laws be then repealed and new by-laws adopted. The report of the executive committee was adopted, and the Yacht Club, by a vote of thirty-eight to three passed the following vote: “The Executive Committee is hereby authorized to cause to be organized a new corporation substantially as recommended in their report, to be known as the Savin Hill Yacht Club Association. When such corporation shall have been organized and one share of its stock given or offered to each regular member of this Club, any remaining shares remaining in its treasury, the Executive Committee is authorized to convey it to [sic] the real and personal property of the Club excepting cash deposited in bank and in the hands of the treasurer, choses in action, supplies kept by the Club for sale to its members, and record and account books, the Association to assume and agree to pay the first and second mortgage notes and other promissory notes of the Club amounting to $10,980 in all. But simultaneously with said conveyance the Association as Lessor and the Club as Lessee shall execute a lease for twenty years from and after Jánuary 1, 1913, of that part of the real estate now occupied by the Club and all the floats, furniture, tools and other things now used by the Club for its yachting and social purposes. Said lease shall provide that the lessee shall keep all and several the buildings in repair and insured against fire and shall also keep in repair or replace the articles of personal property so that it shall turn over to the Association at the end of the term of the lease an inventory of personal property similar and equal to that received by it under the lease. The lessee shall pay water rates, taxes, assume all liability to others and pay in addition a rental of $1,400 a year. The lease shall provide for its immediate termination in case of the taking by public authority by right of eminent domain of the leased land or any part of it, so that all damages in such case shall belong to the Association.”

In accordance with that vote the petitioner was incorporated on March 28, 1913: a certificate for one share of the capital stock was delivered to each regular member of the Club, and a deed of Fox Point, covering also certain personal property, was executed and delivered to the petitioner. As found by the judge, “ One of the purposes for which the Association was incorporated was to preserve the ownership of the property in the original regular members of the Club by making them the sole stockholders in the new corporation. Another purpose was to enable the Club thereafter to take in associate members as regular members. A third purpose was that the new corporation should provide and maintain the grounds and buildings deeded to it for the accommodation of the Savin Hill Yacht Club, and to carry out this last purpose it was agreed that the Association should lease to the Club for 20 years the real estate and other things then used by the Club for Yachting purposes at a specified rental with the provision for the immediate determination of the lease in case of the taking by public authority by right of eminent domain of the leased land or any part of it, and that in that event all damages shall belong to the association.” A lease, as provided for in the vote of October 10, 1912, was read to and authorized by the executive committee of the Yacht Club, and was duly authorized by the Association.

The trial judge further found: “ The two corporations acted under this arrangement from April 9, 1913, to December 23, 1914, when the whole of the real estate leased by the Association to the Club was taken by the Metropolitan Park Commission by eminent domain. In 1917 the park commission took in the same way the remaining real estate of the Association. The Association has collected the damages for said taking. This provision as to damages was inserted in recognition of the fact that the assets belonged to the original regular members. The Yacht Club has continued to occupy a part of the real estate formerly hired from the Association by an arrangement with the Metropolitan Park Commission now paying an annual rental of $750.”

The rulings of law requested by the respondent were based substantially on three contentions: (1) that the petitioner’s stockholders paid no consideration for their shares; (2) that the petitioner and its shareholders took the property impressed with a trust for the benefit of the respondent; (3) that there was a contract whereby the petitioner agreed to furnish suitable grounds and buildings for the-Yacht Club.

1. The first contention is disposed of by the finding and ruling of the judge that “ the original regular members of the Club gave consideration for the stock of the Association, which they received by the surrender of their rights as regular members of the Club (which had no capital stock), in the property of the Club which was conveyed by the Club to the Association, taking shares of stock in the Association instead.” So far as this was a finding of fact, it was fully warranted by the facts above set forth. At the time of the deed to the petitioner the property was really owned by the regular members of the Club, the title standing in the name of the corporation.

2. As the property conveyed did not belong to the respondent, but only to the regular members, no trust resulted in the respondent’s favor. On this record we think that the judge was right in his finding and ruling that “ neither the property of the Savin Hill Yacht Club Association nor the shares of stock are impressed with a trust in favor of the Savin Hill Yacht Club.” As a finding of fact this inference was warranted. Apparently it was the intention of the Club to preserve the beneficial ownership of the property in the regular members for their own benefit through the ownership of the stock of the new corporation. And the Club itself assented to this arrangement, and accepted a lease which negatived the existence of any trust.

3. As the judge further found, “ no contract to furnish the Club with grounds and buildings exists.” One of the main reasons for incorporating the plaintiff association was to permit the Yacht Club to increase its regular membership by taking in associate members, without diminishing the ownership rights of the original regular members. The petitioner was willing to have the Yacht Club with its enlarged membership use the property, on payment of rent and taxes, until it should be taken by eminent domain. This arrangement was planned and authorized by the Cluj) even before the petitioner was incorporated. And the lease, voluntarily executed by the respondent, expressly provided that it should terminate in the event of a taking of the property, and that in such case all damages should belong to the Association.

There was no error in the court’s rulings or refusals to rule: and the interlocutory decree must be affirmed.

Ordered accordingly.