144 Ga. 338
Ga.
1915
Lumpkin, J.

Under the conflicting evidence in this case, there was no abuse ‍​​​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌​‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‍of discretion in denying the interlocutory injunction prayed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Bede, •/., absent.