The evidence adduced upon the trial of this case was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial was
error. Judgment reversed.
Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.Porter & Mebane, for plaintiff in error.James Maddox, solicitor, contra.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
