Savage v. State

28 Ga. App. 543 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1922

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence adduced upon the trial of this case was not sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused, and the overruling of the motion for a new trial was

error. Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Porter & Mebane, for plaintiff in error. James Maddox, solicitor, contra.