Saunders v. State
1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 101
Ga. Ct. App.
1914
Check Treatment
Wade, J.

1. The proof was sufficient to sustain the verdict of guilty, and there is no substantial merit in the assignments of error.

2. A charge to the jury as to-theeomparative weight or probative value of . positive and negative testimony was clearly authorized by the evidence, and the charge given on that subject was sufficiently full. Wood v. State, 9 Ga. App. 365 (71 S. E. 500); Lyens v. State, 133 Ga. 588 (2), 594 (66 S. E. 792).

3. If any fuller or more explicit charge was desired on any feature of the case, a request therefor should have been submitted in writing.

Judgment affirmed.

Roan, J., absent.