Saunders v. StateSaunders v. State
Charlie Crist, Attorney General; Bryan Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
In this direct criminal appeal, we affirm appellant‘s convictions and sentences. We conclude that the trial court correctly denied appellant‘s motions for judgment of acquittal, and that Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), does not prohibit the trial court‘s finding that appellant qualified as an habitual felony offender. See, e.g., Jones v. State, 791 So.2d 580 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). However, because the trial court failed to inform appellant before imposing a public defender lien of her right to contest the amount, and because appellant preserved this issue by a timely filed motion pursuant to
AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.
WEBSTER, LEWIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.