History
  • No items yet
midpage
Saunders v. Mortensen
98 Ohio St. 3d 1458
Ohio
2003
Check Treatment

Erie App. No. E-02-008, 2002-Ohio-6244. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 11 of the court of appeals’ Decision and Judgment Entry dated November 15, 2002:

“The question presented is whether the language of Nationwide Insurance Endorsement 2352 may be reasonably construed in the manner articulated by this court and the Franklin County Court of Appeals in Nicolini-Brownfield v. Eigensee (Sept. 16, 1999), Franklin App. No. 98AP-1244 [1999 WL 717308], so as to give rise to an ambiguity in underinsured motorists coverage.”

Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is Carroll v. Allstate Ins. Co., 148 Ohio App.3d 413, 2002-Ohio-3074, 773 N.E.2d 1061.

Case Details

Case Name: Saunders v. Mortensen
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 19, 2003
Citation: 98 Ohio St. 3d 1458
Docket Number: 2002-2138
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.