166 A.2d 492 | D.C. | 1960
This suit arose out of a motor vehicle accident. Appellant, defendant in the trial court, was the operator of an automobile which struck the minor appellee while he was in the process of crossing a street in or near an unmarked crosswalk. Trial was by the court and a finding was entered for appellees. The errors relied upon for reversal relate to the sufficiency of the evidence as to appellant’s negligence, contributory negligence as a matter of law, and the admission of evidence as to the width of crosswalks. In view of the general finding, we have to accept the evidence most favorable to appellees’ case.
There was conflicting evidence as to the speed of the automobile at the time of the accident, whether it was merely raining or whether there was a “cloudburst,” whether the minor stopped at the curb and looked before entering the street,
With regard to the contention concerning the evidentiary ruling, we are convinced, after an examination of the entire record, that appellant was not prejudiced thereby.
Affirmed.