Satulovsky v. Satulovsky
100 So. 3d 192
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2012
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).1

. This ruling generously accords appellant with the benefit of treating his motion to dismiss as a Rule 12.540 motion, but for which this appeal would be untimely.