History
  • No items yet
midpage
Satulovsky v. Satulovsky
100 So. 3d 192
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2012
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979).1

. This ruling generously accords appellant with the benefit of treating his motion to dismiss as a Rule 12.540 motion, but for which this appeal would be untimely.

Case Details

Case Name: Satulovsky v. Satulovsky
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Oct 24, 2012
Citation: 100 So. 3d 192
Docket Number: No. 3D11-2514
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.