History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sartori v. Angelone
35 F. App'x 58
4th Cir.
2002
Check Treatment
Docket

*1 Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Helfried E. Sartori, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Helfried Sartori seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant Sartori’s motion to supplement, we deny his motions for appointment of counsel and for a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Sartori v. Angelone, No. CA-01-573-AM (E.D. Va., filed Nov. 13, 2001; entered Nov. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Sartori v. Angelone
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: May 6, 2002
Citation: 35 F. App'x 58
Docket Number: 01-8121
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.