History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sargent v. Wilson
59 N.H. 396
N.H.
1879
Check Treatment

Testimony introduced to impeach the credit of a witness, to be competent must be founded upon the witness's reputation for truth. General reputation affecting his character in other ways than for truth is not sufficient, and a belief in the want of veracity of the witness, founded on personal dealings with him, is not a belief derived from reputation, and is not admissible evidence to impeach his credit. The testimony admitted to impeach the witness was not competent for that purpose. State v. Howard,9 N.H. 485; Chase v. Blodgett, 10 N.H. 22; Hoitt v. Moulton, 21 N.H. 586,591, 592; Kelley v. Proctor, 41 N.H. 139.

Award set aside.

FOSTER, J., did not sit: the others concurred. *Page 397

Case Details

Case Name: Sargent v. Wilson
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1879
Citation: 59 N.H. 396
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.