225 A.D.2d 755 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1996
The award for future medical expenses should be reduced to $18,000 since there was no other evidence to support the jury’s verdict and it was, therefore, clearly speculative. While there was testimony by the plaintiff’s expert that the plaintiff’s back pain will probably worsen due to the shortening of the plaintiff’s right leg, the only testimony regarding future medical expenses related to the $18,000 for the surgeries outlined above. Accordingly, the award of $30,000 for future medical expense was based upon "uninformed speculation” (Cramer v Kuhns, 213 AD2d 131, 139; see, Brownell v Thomas, 201 AD2d 872; Liebman v Otis El. Co., 145 AD2d 546, 547; Buggs v Veterans Butter & Egg Co., 120 AD2d 361).