Santos v. Anderson

May 20, 1929
Versions:146 A. 916
106 N.J.L. 596
1929 N.J. LEXIS 199
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Campbell, White, Yan Buskirk, McGlennon, Kats, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.