Santo-Perez v. Enterprise Leasing Co.Santo-Perez v. Enterprise Leasing Co.
Although we do not find that defendant made a valid waiver of the right to appeal, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.
Defendant‘s challenge to imposition of the mandatory surcharge is premature; it should be raised in the sentencing court by a motion for resentencing at the end of defendant‘s incarceration, and not on direct appeal (People v Bradley, 249 AD2d 103 [1st Dept 1998], lv denied 92 NY2d 923 [1998]). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Acosta, Moskowitz, Richter and Feinman, JJ.