Santi v. Zack Co.

287 So. 2d 127 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1973

PER CURIAM.

The single point raised on this appeal is whether the trial judge erred in denying plaintiffs-appellants’ motion to amend the complaint during trial. The amendment sought to completely change the basis of the action. It cannot be said that under the circumstances of this case an abuse of discretion has been shown. See Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Fla.App. 1971, 252 So.2d 817.

Affirmed.