Santi v. Zack Co., 287 So. 2d 127

PER CURIAM.

The single point raised on this appeal is whether the trial judge erred in denying plaintiffs-appellants’ motion to amend the complaint during trial. The amendment sought to completely change the basis of the action. It cannot be said that under the circumstances of this case an abuse of discretion has been shown. See Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Fla.App. 1971, 252 So.2d 817.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Santi v. Zack Co.

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Dec 18, 1973

Citations: 287 So. 2d 127; 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6149; No. 73-164

Docket Number: No. 73-164

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.