History
  • No items yet
midpage
Santana v. State
442 So. 2d 1103
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1983
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Ruben Santana filed a motion to correct sentence pursuant to Villery v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 396 So.2d 1107 (Fla.1980). The trial court granted the motion and, without the defendant’s being present, resentenced Santana to five years in the state penitentiary, a sentence that was at variance with Santana’s plea agreement. The state candidly and appropriately acknowledges the compound error, see State v. Scott, 439 So.2d 219 (Fla.1983) (defendant has right to be present except in the most exceptional cases); Forbert v. State, 437 So.2d 1079 (Fla.1983) (defendant should be permitted to withdraw a guilty plea if sentence imposed is not contemplated by plea agreement).

Accordingly, in light of the foregoing authorities, we remand to the trial court with directions to vacate the sentence of five years and to resentence the defendant.

Remanded with directions.

Case Details

Case Name: Santana v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 27, 1983
Citation: 442 So. 2d 1103
Docket Number: No. 83-1570
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.