History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sanger v. New York
251 U.S. 537
SCOTUS
1919
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) California Powder Works v¿ Davis, 151 U. ,S. 389, 393; Sayward v. *538Denny, 158 U. S. 180, 183; Harding v. Illinois, 196 U. S. 78, 86. (2) Thomas v. Iowa, 209 U. S. 258, 263; Bowe v. Scott, 233 U. S. 658, 664; and see El Paso Sash & Door Co. v. Carraway, 245 U. S. 643. Mr. Jonah J. Goldstein for plaintiff in error. Mr. Harry G. Anderson, with whom Mr. Harry E. Lewis was on the brief, for defendant in error.

Case Details

Case Name: Sanger v. New York
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Nov 17, 1919
Citation: 251 U.S. 537
Docket Number: No. 75
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.