Sanford v. State

May 15, 1923
6 Div. 118.
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Bricken
BRICKEN, P. J.

This defendant was tried and convicted for grand larceny. ‍‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‍The property alleged to have been stolen consisted of an automobile belonging to one Abner F. Horton. He was duly sentenced to ‍‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‍hard labor for the county, and appeals.

There is no bill of exceptions, and in the absence of same we cannot review ‍‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‍the ruling of the court in denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. For like reasons and for the further reason, ‍‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‍also, that the court’s ural charge is not set out in the record, we cannot consider the refused charges.

No errdr is apparent ‍‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​‌‌‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​​​‌‍on the record, and the judgment appealed from must be affirmed.

Affirmed.