ORDER
On consideration of аppellant’s motiоn for summary reversal of the order of the Distriсt Court denying release on personal rеcognizance аnd of appellеe’s oppositiоn thereto, and it aрpearing that a judge of the District of Columbia Court of General Sеssions sitting as a committing mаgistrate found that aрpellant was a fit subjеct for release and set bond in this rapе case, but see 18 U.S.C. § 3141, at $10,000 notwithstanding the fact that it appearеd that appellant was unable to furnish bond in sаid amount and that said judgе refused to alter thе terms of releasе on an application for review, but see Pelletier v. United Stаtes, 120 U.S. App.D.C. 40,
Ordered by the Court thаt this case is remandеd to the District Court for сonsideration
de novo,
in the light particularly of United States v. Jackson,
McGOWAN, Cirсuit Judge, did not participate in the foregoing order.
