Sanderson v. StateSanderson v. State
Sanderson appeals from a judgment convicting him of kidnapping and three counts of sexual battery. He was sentenced to four concurrent life sentences. We affirm the convictions.
Sanderson was indicted for three counts of sexual battery committed upon [name deleted] a person (11) years or younger.1 Sanderson sought to prove insanity as a defense. He admitted taking the child to an orange grove, hitting him, and forcing him to undress, but claimed he could not recall anything thereafter. The child testified Sanderson forced him into his car, drove him to the orange grove, beat him up and repeatedly sexually assaulted him. The child testified that he was eleven years and eight months old at the time of the offense. At the close of the state‘s case, the defense moved for a judgment of acquittal on the ground that the child‘s age was not corroborated by any testimony other than his own. Defense counsel did not renew the motion at the close of all the evidence, or after the jury returned its guilty verdict.
The appellant argues that the conviction should be reversed because the victim‘s age exceeded eleven years when the offense occurred, and he relies upon State v. Carroll, 378 So.2d 4 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Carroll is distinguishable because in this case the issue of sufficiency of the evidence was not preserved for appeal. The appellant‘s motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of the state‘s case did not specify the ground relied upon in this appeal, contrary to
AFFIRMED.
FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., J., and JAMIESON, FRANCES ANN, Associate Judge, concur.