18 Vt. 107 | Vt. | 1846
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The notice given by Smith to Thomas about the first of July, 1837, not having been assented to by Thomas, or acted upon by either of the copartners afterwards, was not a dissolution of the copartnership. If, however, it were in law a dissolution of the copartnership, it could not affect the plaintiff’s right to recover, inasmuch as no notice of the same was given to the plaintiff. Story on Partnership 247.
The judgment of the county court is reversed, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff upon the report for the amount of his account.