17 S.E.2d 251 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1941
The evidence, while wholly circumstantial, was amply sufficient to exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the defendant's guilt; and the special assignments of error fail to show cause for a reversal of the judgment.
The other special assignments of error are based on the admission in evidence of the shoes and a knife of the defendant. The grounds allege that these articles were taken from the defendant's person while under an illegal arrest and that he was thereby forced to incriminate himself. There is no allegation in the grounds that the defendant himself was forced to handover his shoes and knife to the officers, but the allegations are that they took them from him. "Evidence obtained by an illegal and unauthorized search of one's person is admissible against him, and does not violate this constitutional guaranty [that no person shall be compelled to give testimony in any manner to criminate himself]." Calhoun v. State,
Judgment affirmed. MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.