History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sanders v. Gillett
8 Daly 183
New York Court of Common Pleas
1878
Check Treatment
Charles P. Daly, Chief Justice.

The lien of the attorney has, in this State, always been regarded as subject to the equitable right of set-off between the parties. I adverted to this distinction in Ward v. Wordsworth (1 E. D. Smith, 603) as settled by the cases of Spencer v. White (1 Johns. Cases, 102), Pindar v. Morris (3 Cai. 165) and The People, &c., v. Manning (13 Wend. 652), and it was upheld in Roberts v. Carter (24 How. Pr. 44) and Brooks v. Handford (15 Abb. Pr. 342).

The decision below, therefore, must be affirmed, there being no question where the defendant is insolvent, but that it is equitable to order the set-off. (Rignolet v. Greer, 19 Abb. Pr. 264 ; Bradley v. Angell, 3.N. Y. 475.)

Yah Hoesen, J., concurred.

Order affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Sanders v. Gillett
Court Name: New York Court of Common Pleas
Date Published: Dec 2, 1878
Citation: 8 Daly 183
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.