69 A.2d 7 | Vt. | 1949
This is a petition to revise and modify a decree for alimony. The defendant filed a demurrer to the petition which was overruled and the cause was passed to this Court before final judgment.
The only material ground of the petition is that the order of payment of alimony made at the time the divorce was granted the defendant was too much for the plaintiff to pay in view of his financial condition.
The grounds of the demurrer are, in substance, that there is no allegation in the petition that the pertinent circumstances as regards either of the parties had in any way changed since the date of the entry of the decree of divorce and that the allegations are only as to matters existing at the time of the original hearing and of the entry of the decree therein.
The petition is brought under V. S. 3249, Rev. of 1947, which as far as here material reads as follows: "After a decree for alimony *71 for the wife or children, the court may revise and alter its decree from time to time, on the petition of either party and due notice, respecting the amount of such alimony and the payment thereof, and may make such decree respecting any of such matters as might have been made in the original action."
The plaintiff, in support of the ruling of the lower court, says that this petition was heard on December 3, 1948, at which time the defendant moved that the petition be dismissed and that the motion was denied with exceptions to the ruling not taken to this Court. The plaintiff claims that this ruling or adjudication is final and conclusive not only as to the matter actually determined but as to every other matter which the parties might have litigated and have had decided, as incident to or essentially connected with the subject matter of the litigation. In short the plaintiff claims, in effect, that the right to have his petition considered has been determined in his favor under the doctrine of res judicata. He cites Tillison v.Tillison,
The question of whether it is necessary to show a change in circumstances or conditions subsequent to the entry of the original decree for alimony in order to give the trial court authority to revise or alter the decree under the provisions of § 3249 supra has never been directly put in issue and decided by this Court, as far as we are able to ascertain. However, in some of our cases there is language strongly indicating the necessity of such a showing in order to successfully invoke the aid of the statute. See Andrew v. Andrew,
Inasmuch as the petition does not set forth any change in circumstances which have arisen since the entry of the alimony decree it was insufficient and the demurrer should have been sustained.
The judgment overruling the demurrer is reversed and the causeremanded.