History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sanborn v. Sanborn
65 N.H. 172
N.H.
1889
Check Treatment

The note was an executory promise made upon no sufficient legal consideration, and no action can be maintained upon it. It is invalid as a gift causa mortis. The donor's own promissory note, payable to the donee, cannot be the subject of a donatio causa mortis. Copp v. Sawyer,6 N.H. 386; Flint v. Pattee, 33 N.H. 520; Parish v. Stone, 14 Pick. 198. It cannot operate as a bequest because it was not executed in conformity with the requirements of the statute of wills. Bartlett v. Remington,59 N.H. 364; Towle v. Wood, 60 N.H. 434; Morey v. Sohier, 63 N.H. 507, 513.

Judgment for the defendants.

CARPENTER, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Sanborn v. Sanborn
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1889
Citation: 65 N.H. 172
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.