History
  • No items yet
midpage
Samuel v. de la Sota
54 Pa. Super. 1
Pa. Super. Ct.
1913
Check Treatment

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

The opinion of the court below filed on discharging a rule for a new trial so clearly and fully answers the appellant’s argument in this court that it is unnecessary to further review the case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Samuel v. de la Sota
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jul 16, 1913
Citation: 54 Pa. Super. 1
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 230
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.