History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sampson v. Metropolitan Transit Authority
83 N.E.2d 876
Mass.
1949
Check Treatment

Exceptions overruled. The plaintiff, a passenger who was hurt alighting from a bus of the Boston Elevated Railway Company, brings this action of tort. The defendant was substituted as party defendant. St. 1947, c. 544, § 20. *758The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff following the denial of the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. There was no error. There was evidence that the bus had stopped close to the curbstone in response to the plaintiff’s ringing the signal bell; that the operator opened the doors for her to leave; and that while both her feet were on the lower step and just as she was about to step off, the bus suddenly started and threw her onto the sidewalk, breaking her hip. The plaintiff testified that she did not know what caused the bus to start. Upon the evidence it was a question for the jury whether the plaintiff’s injuries were due to the defendant’s negligence. McDernott v. Boston Elevated Railway, 208 Mass. 104. Killam v. Wellesley & Boston Street Railway, 214 Mass. 283, 284-285. Gray v. Boston Elevated Railway, 215 Mass. 143, 145, 148. Weil v. Boston Elevated Railway, 218 Mass. 397. Perella v. Boston Elevated Railway, 306 Mass. 547, 549. Pelland v. D’Allesandro, 321 Mass. 387, 389.

A. W. Wunderly, for the defendant. T. J. Murphy, for the plaintiff.

Case Details

Case Name: Sampson v. Metropolitan Transit Authority
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Feb 3, 1949
Citation: 83 N.E.2d 876
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.