History
  • No items yet
midpage
Samora v. Poulin
1:07-cv-00079
D.N.H.
May 29, 2007
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Case 1:07-cv-00079-JM Document 13 Filed 05/29/07 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Nicholaus Samora

v. Civil No. 07-cv-079-PB Angela Poulin, et al.

O R D E R

Plaintiff has filed a “Witness Request List” and “Supplemental Witness Request List” which appear an effort to comply with LR 45.2. While the rule permits issuance of subpoenas there is no waiver of witness fees and this plaintiff is without funds to pay them. The Attorney General has complied with reasonable requests to produce witnesses in the past.

Poulin, Fortier, Cox and Blaisdell are defendants and are alleged to have directly denied plaintiff’s constitutional rights. They should be present. The issue isn’t why Kench responds for the Commissioner so he is not necessary. Starr is not essential to the alleged denial of plaintiff’s rights.

The “requests” (document nos. 11 and 12) are granted as to

Case 1:07-cv-00079-JM Document 13 Filed 05/29/07 Page 2 of 2 Poulin, Fortier, Cox and Blaisdell and otherwise denied. The Clerk is ordered to provide the subpoenas for those four people.

SO ORDERED.

____________________________________ James R. Muirhead United States Magistrate Judge Date: May 29, 2007

cc: Nicholaus Samora, pro se

Andrew B. Livernois, Esq.

2

Case Details

Case Name: Samora v. Poulin
Court Name: District Court, D. New Hampshire
Date Published: May 29, 2007
Docket Number: 1:07-cv-00079
Court Abbreviation: D.N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.