Sammut v. DavisSammut v. Davis
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the first and second causes of action are dismissed.
The defendants made a prima facie showing that the plaintiff Philip Sammut (hereinafter the plaintiff) did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of
Accordingly, the defendants’ motion, in effect, for summary judgment dismissing the first and second causes of action should have been granted. Prudenti, P.J., Schmidt, Santucci, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.