History
  • No items yet
midpage
Salyers v. Burkhart
44 Ohio St. 2d 186
Ohio
1975
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The motion to certify the record in this cause was allowed because of the breadth of the holding in the Court of Appeals and the importance of the proposition of law enunciated.

Although this court agrees that the question of tort liability of teachers acting within the scope of their daily teaching responsibilites is one which should be authoritatively answered, the facts of the instant case are inappropriate to support the announcement of a rule of broad and general application.

Hence, solely under the circumstances at bar and the allegations of the complaint herein, a majority of the court agrees that the judgment of the Court of Appeals should be, and hereby is, affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

O’Netll, C. J., HERBERT, Stern, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur. Corrigan and Celebbezze, LT,, dissent.

Case Details

Case Name: Salyers v. Burkhart
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 24, 1975
Citation: 44 Ohio St. 2d 186
Docket Number: No. 74-1031
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.