PER CURIAM.
Fees and costs were imposed against appellant without giving him adequate notice *331and an opportunity to be heard. This constitutes error, Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947" court="Fla." date_filed="1984-01-19" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/jenkins-v-state-1094206?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1094206">444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984); Mays v. State, 519 So. 2d 618" court="Fla." date_filed="1988-02-04" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/mays-v-state-1736075?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1736075">519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988), of fundamental proportions. Wood v. State, 544 So. 2d 1004" court="Fla." date_filed="1989-05-25" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/wood-v-state-1772054?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="1772054">544 So.2d 1004, 1006 (Fla.1989). We reverse and remand without prejudice to the state’s right to again seek fees and costs after notice and hearing.
HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.