History
  • No items yet
midpage
Saline County v. Sappington
64 Mo. 72
Mo.
1876
Check Treatment
Sherwood, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Action on an instrument executed by Sappington, as treasurer of Saline county, and by the other defendants as his sureties. The instrument was, not a bond in consequence of lacking the word ā€œ seals ā€ in the body thereof.

Breaches were set out, reformation of the instrument so as to .make it a specialty, and judgment for the penalty and execution, etc., were asked for. The defendants successfully demurred. There was no insufficiency in the petition. A mere prayer for relief is hot demurrable. The instrument sued on was well enough without a seal; was good as a common law contract, made on adequate consideration, (Henoch vs. Chaney, 61 Mo. 129) therefore no necessity existed for reformation, and the prayer therefor may be rejected as surplusage. The mere prayer for relief does not constitute a distinct cause of action, but only seeks a particular remedy. (McClurg vs. Phillips, 49 Mo. 315.)

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded;

the other judges concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Saline County v. Sappington
Court Name: Supreme Court of Missouri
Date Published: Oct 15, 1876
Citation: 64 Mo. 72
Court Abbreviation: Mo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.