History
  • No items yet
midpage
Salina City v. Freece
61 Utah 574
Utah
1923
Check Treatment
WEBER, C. J.

Eiler Freece ivas convicted before the justice of the peace for the city of Salina on a charge of having violated the merchants’ license ordinance of that city. From the judgment of conviction he appealed to the district court of Sevier county, which court sustained a demurrer to the complaint and *575dismissed tbe action. The city of Salina appeals from the judgment of dismissal.

The respondent moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that a city cannot appeal from an order of the district court dismissing a criminal action arising in a justice of the peace court.

In Castle Dale v. Woolley, 61 Utah 291, 212 Pac. 1111, it was held by this court that—

“Neither the Constitution nor statutes of this state authorize a city to appeal from a judgment of the city justice’s court in favor of the defendant, * * * in a criminal case for the violation of a city ordinance.”

It follows that a city cannot appeal from the judgment of the district' court in a criminal action for the violation of a city ordinance, where the action originates in the court of a city justice.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted, with costs to respondent.

GIDEON, THURMAN, and CHERRY, JJ., concur. FRICK, J., did not participate herein.

Case Details

Case Name: Salina City v. Freece
Court Name: Utah Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 19, 1923
Citation: 61 Utah 574
Docket Number: No. 3967
Court Abbreviation: Utah
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.