History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sager v. State
200 Ala. 569
| Ala. | 1917
|
Check Treatment

The defendant was convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to death.

He appeals on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions, and we are unable to review the action of the trial court in overruling defendant's motion to quash the indictment because found by an illegal grand jury, or to quash the venire because a true copy of the indictment was not served on him therewith. Garrett v. State, 97 Ala. 18, 14 So. 327; Rudolph v. State, 172 Ala. 379, 55 So. 610.

For the same reason we cannot review the action of the trial court in overruling defendant's objections to being put upon trial because of the defect and omission above mentioned.

The demurrer to the indictment because of the alleged illegality of the grand jury was, of course, properly overruled, no defect appearing on the face of the indictment.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.

Affirmed. All the Justices concur, except MAYFIELD, J., not sitting.

Case Details

Case Name: Sager v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Nov 29, 1917
Citation: 200 Ala. 569
Docket Number: 5 Div. 682.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.