History
  • No items yet
midpage
Saenger Realty Corp. v. Grosjean
310 U.S. 613
SCOTUS
1940
Check Treatment
Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) *614Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441, 443. (2) Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U. S. 30, 32; Leffingwell v. Warren, 2 Black 599, 603; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co., 287 U. S. 358, 362.

Mr. Charles Rosen for appellant. Messrs. F. A. Blanche and E. Leland Richardson for ap-pellee.

Case Details

Case Name: Saenger Realty Corp. v. Grosjean
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: May 27, 1940
Citation: 310 U.S. 613
Docket Number: No. 998
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In