History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sadowsky v. Levine
151 So. 2d 2
Fla.
1963
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the petition is without merit. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged, 135 So.2d 776.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, Acting C. J., THOMAS, CALDWELL, HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and SMITH, Circuit Judge, concur. DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., dissent.





Dissenting Opinion

DREW, Justice

(dissenting).

I would grant certiorari and quash the decision of the district court for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of Judge PEARSON, TILLMAN.

O’CONNELL, J., concurs.

Case Details

Case Name: Sadowsky v. Levine
Court Name: Supreme Court of Florida
Date Published: Feb 13, 1963
Citation: 151 So. 2d 2
Docket Number: No. 31757
Court Abbreviation: Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.