History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sadlowski v. Meeron
220 N.W. 680
Mich.
1927
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

ON REHEARING.
(ON REHEARING.)
On defendants' motion a rehearing was granted in this case. It has again been orally argued by counsel.

I have again read the record with care and examined the authorities relied on by counsel. It will serve no useful purpose to restate what was said in the former opinion. I still adhere to the views therein expressed.

The judgment should be affirmed.

FEAD, C.J., and NORTH, McDONALD, and POTTER, JJ., concurred with SHARPE, J. *Page 603






Dissenting Opinion

Reargument and reconsideration confirms the views expressed in my opinion reported in 240 Mich. 306.

The judgment should be reversed without a new trial.

FELLOWS and CLARK, JJ., concurred with WIEST, J.

Case Details

Case Name: Sadlowski v. Meeron
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 3, 1927
Citation: 220 N.W. 680
Docket Number: Docket No. 132, Calendar No. 33,067.
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.