History
  • No items yet
midpage
Saddle River Country Day Sch. v. Borough of Saddle River
150 A.2d 34
N.J.
1959
Check Treatment
29 N.J. 468 (1959)
150 A.2d 34

THE SADDLE RIVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL AND CHESTNUT RIDGE LAND CO., INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
THE BOROUGH OF SADDLE RIVER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
WILLIAM C. WOLLEN, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE SADDLE RIVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL AND CHESTNUT RIDGE LAND CO., INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 16, 1959.
Decided April 7, 1959.

Mr. Fred G. Stickel, III and Mr. John J. Breslin, Jr. argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Breslin & Breslin, attorneys for William C. Wollen et als.; Messrs. Stickel & Stickel, attorneys for Borough of Saddle River).

Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for the respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Hall in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS and PROCTOR — 5.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Saddle River Country Day Sch. v. Borough of Saddle River
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: Apr 7, 1959
Citation: 150 A.2d 34
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.