History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sackin v. Grossman
167 A.D. 940
N.Y. App. Div.
1915
Check Treatment

Order of the County Court of Kings county reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that the order should have been made by the county judge and not by the County Court. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2457.) Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Sackin v. Grossman
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 15, 1915
Citation: 167 A.D. 940
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.