S.A. v. State
611 So. 2d 116 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1993
The State concedes that S.A.’s placement in secure detention as a punishment for contempt was improper pursuant to A. A. v. Rolle, 604 So.2d 813 (Fla.1992). Accordingly, we must vacate the order of detention and remand for proceedings consistent with Rolle.
REMANDED.
