S.A. v. State, No. 92-923

No. 92-923 | Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | Jan 22, 1993

PER CURIAM.

The State concedes that S.A.’s placement in secure detention as a punishment for contempt was improper pursuant to A. A. v. Rolle, 604 So. 2d 813" date_filed="1992-07-23" court="Fla." case_name="AA v. Rolle">604 So.2d 813 (Fla.1992). Accordingly, we must vacate the order of detention and remand for proceedings consistent with Rolle.

REMANDED.

COWART, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.