S. C. Smith v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
395 F.2d 747
5th Cir.1968Check Treatment
PER CURIAM:
In this habeas corpus proceeding (28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 et seq.), there was an evidentiary hearing in the district court in accordance with the teachings of Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 83 S.Ct. 745, 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1963), and Fay v. Noia, 372 U.S. 391, 83 S.Ct. 822, 9 L.Ed.2d 837 (1963), and the district court made findings of fact, which were fully justified by the record, .which we could not say are clearly erroneous. Rule 52 (a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Additionally, the district judge’s conclusions of law were consistent with such findings. Hence, this case should be and is
Affirmed.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
