History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ryden v. . Jones
10 N.C. 24
N.C.
1824
Check Treatment

Petition for distributive shares.

GASTON produced a notice to the petitioners from the defendant of an intended motion for a rule to show cause why there should not be a new taxation of costs in this case. It was a petition for distributive shares, filed against the defendant, as executor, in which a decree had been made for petitioners, Ryden v. Jones, 8 N.C. 497, and the clerk had taxed the defendant with the cost of plaintiff's witnesses. The Court granted the rule, and afterwards made it absolute, stating that cases of this kind must be governed by the rules of chancery practice, and that plaintiff might have taken the depositions of his witnesses. A new taxation of costs was ordered accordingly.

Cited: Griffith v. Byrd, 24 N.C. 72; Newsom v. Newson, 26 N.C. 389;Bowers v. Bowers, 30 N.C. 249.

(25)

Case Details

Case Name: Ryden v. . Jones
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 5, 1824
Citation: 10 N.C. 24
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.