History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ryan Anderson v. Pfizer Inc.
20-2102
| 4th Cir. | Sep 3, 2021
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before FLOYD, RICHARDSON, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ryan Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Adam Benjamin Pratt, KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Williamsburg, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ryan Anderson appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendant’s motion to dismiss his civil action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Anderson v. Pfizer Inc. , No. 3:20-cv-00629-JAG (E.D. Va. Sept. 16, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Ryan Anderson v. Pfizer Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 3, 2021
Docket Number: 20-2102
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.