History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ruud v. Jensen
3 Wash. 785
Wash.
1892
Check Treatment
Hoyt, J.

This action is of the some nature as that of Newhouse v. Simino, ante, p. 648, and the judgment rendered herein cannot stand in the light of the discussion in that cause; and the further point is well taken in this case that the verdict and judgment were totally unwarranted by the proofs, and more in the nature of the finding of friendly arbitrators than of a jury upon legal question submitted to them.

The judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded with in-tructions to dismiss the action; neither party to recover costs in this court, or in the court below.

Anders, C. J., and Stiles, Scott and Dunbar, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Ruud v. Jensen
Court Name: Washington Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 29, 1892
Citation: 3 Wash. 785
Docket Number: No. 270
Court Abbreviation: Wash.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.