Rutgers v. Martin

Jan 9, 1942
Versions:23 A.2d 406
127 N.J.L. 603
1942 N.J. LEXIS 220
Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Parker, Bodine, Pbrskie, P-orter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Woles-Keil, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.