The facts in this case are identical with the facts in Rust v. Kennedy, No. 7719, ante p. 472, 100 Pac. 998, except that a different piece of land is involved. For the reasons there stated, the judgment in this case must be affirmed.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
