History
  • No items yet
midpage
Russell v. Texas
465 U.S. 1073
SCOTUS
1984
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Ct. Crim. App. Tex.;

Sup. Ct. N. M.;

Sup. Ct. Tenn.;

*1074No. 83-6020. No. 83-6043. No. 83-6148. Smith v. Arizona. Engle v. Florida. Teffeteller v. Florida.

Sup. Ct. Ariz.;

Sup. Ct. Fla.; and

Sup. Ct. Fla. Certiorari denied. Reported below: No. 83-5799, 655 S. W. 2d 711; No. 83-5943, 100 N. M. 392, 671 P. 2d 640; No. 83-6016, 657 S. W. 2d 405; No. 83-6020, 138 Ariz. 79, 673 P. 2d 17; No. 83-6043, 438 So. 2d 803; No. 83-6148, 439 So. 2d 840.






Dissenting Opinion

Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.

Case Details

Case Name: Russell v. Texas
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Feb 27, 1984
Citation: 465 U.S. 1073
Docket Number: No. 83-5799; No. 83-5943; No. 83-6016; No. 83-6020; No. 83-6043; No. 83-6148
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.